The overrun that ate the company
A plant move ran 63 per cent over budget. The business survived the construction. It did not survive the way the gap was paid for.
On a Thursday in September, a bank gave a busy food manufacturer less than two weeks to repay its operating line. The next day, the company was in court seeking protection from its creditors. Its products were still selling. Its plant was still running. What it had run out of was time, and the reason traces back not to a bad year but to a good idea.
A sensible decision
The company had outgrown its rented premises. Rent was rising and capacity was tight, so management did what owners across Ontario have done for decades: it secured a larger building and planned a move. The budget for fitting out the new plant was roughly $4.8 million, with production to switch over in December 2025.
It slipped to July 2026. The court filing lists the usual suspects: contractor delays, inflation, higher steel tariffs, energy costs, and certification delays that for a period stopped the company selling anything made in the new building. By the end, the renovation had come in 63 per cent over budget, adding more than $3 million in costs.
None of that is exotic. Overruns and delays happen on industrial fit-outs, and many businesses absorb them. This one could not, and the reason is where the money came from.
Where the money came from
The company's long-term, fixed-asset lender declined to fund the overrun. So the gap was filled from three places that are rarely meant for capital projects. About $2.3 million came out of day-to-day operations. Shareholders advanced about $1.2 million. And suppliers were asked to wait for payment.
Each of those choices is defensible on its own. Together they did something dangerous: they turned a long-term asset into a short-term cash problem. Money that should have been buying ingredients and paying staff was pouring concrete. Meanwhile the company was running two facilities at once, paying for both while the new one could not yet sell.
The construction was survivable. The financing plan was not.
The demand
The working-capital lender, holding a revolving line of roughly $5 million that was almost fully drawn, issued its demand in mid-September. By then the company carried more than $20 million in liabilities across secured lenders, contractors and suppliers. Efforts over the summer to find a buyer or investor had not closed the gap. The filing came the following day.
To its credit, the business kept producing through the busy season, and a court-supervised sale is under way. Whether the company survives in some form is now a question for bidders. But the outcome for its owners was shaped months earlier, when the overrun began to be paid for with working capital.
The pattern, and where it shows up first
We have written this up not to second-guess the people involved, but because the pattern is common and the warning signs are visible early. Each one appears in an ordinary set of monthly books, long before a demand letter:
| Warning sign | What to watch | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Liquidity thins | Current ratio drifting below your industry's average | Operating cash is quietly funding something long-term |
| Debt stacks up | Debt to equity rising faster than earnings | Each new lender has less cushion, and a demand from one can trigger the rest |
| Suppliers stretch | Days to pay suppliers climbing month after month | Suppliers become unofficial lenders, and they talk to each other |
| Margins squeeze | Gross margin falling while two sites run at once | Duplicate costs eat the profit that was meant to repay the project |
Three questions before any capital project
- If this runs 50 per cent over, who pays?Agree the overrun funding before the first contractor starts, not after. A committed contingency, or a lender who has said yes in writing, is worth more than an optimistic budget.
- Are we funding a long-term asset with short-term money?An operating line exists to carry inventory and receivables. When it pays for a building, the business loses the very buffer it needs if anything else goes wrong.
- How many months can we run both?Moves and expansions mean paying for two operations at once. Know the monthly cost of that overlap, and how many months of delay the business can carry before suppliers or the bank start to feel it.
The uncomfortable lesson is that this company did not fail because it was badly run or because its market collapsed. It failed because a reasonable plan met an ordinary setback, and the financing had no room for it. That is a risk many healthy, long-lived businesses carry without knowing it.
Would your business absorb a 50% overrun?
The free Value Assessment takes about ten minutes and shows the value drivers that protect, or expose, your business.
This analysis uses public records and reporting. Businesses are not named out of respect for their employees and management. Gamani Group is not a licensed insolvency trustee, and nothing here is legal, insolvency or financial advice for any particular situation.
One case file a month. No noise.
Straight to your inbox. Unsubscribe any time.